"Oh yeah, I made sure my condition levels are higher," he said. And Carter himself said he's in better shape now than he was at his Pro Day. Sure, there's plenty of time before that matters. It took until the third question when Sirainni was asked if he has any concern about Carter's conditioning "at this point in time." But the questions were only about Carter's conditioning. This is everybody out there, and quite frankly, this is everybody out there practicing this weekend in rookie mini-camp."Īgain, fair enough. "Basically, I'm generalizing our entire team of saying they are not in good enough shape yet," Sirianni said. Sirianni added that he cut practice short Friday and that he gave players time in between reps. Sirianni doubled down on how none of the 50-some players on hand, including tryouts, were in game shape. The Eagles are in the strength and conditioning portion of spring workouts, with practices starting the week of May 30.ĮAGLES' RB DECISION: Why the Eagles' question isn't if D'Andre Swift is better than Bijan Robinson (he's not)įACTORY CHURNING: Why Eagles 'QB factory' is back in business, even with Jalen Hurts' big contractīut then Sirianni was asked about that response not being very reassuring given Carter's conditioning issue at his Pro Day. There isn't a real game for four months, training camp for 2½ months. "So, to say any of them are in really good football shape, and they are ready to play a game tomorrow, I would say that's inaccurate. They have been getting ready for the combine. They have been getting ready for pro days. "We are trying to get everybody back into shape, of football-playing shape," Sirianni said. Carter admittedly wasn't in shape for his Pro Day at Georgia in March, when he had to cut a few drills short. Sirianni was asked about Carter's conditioning level during rookie minicamps this past weekend. PHILADELPHIA − It was an innocuous question, one that Eagles coach Nick Sirianni could have brushed aside the way he expects rookie defensive tackle Jalen Carter to brush aside offensive linemen. Where \$r\$ is your resistance, \$j\$ is your imaginary number \$\sqrt\$ and \$x\$ is your reactance which is your "resistance" of your capacitance or inductance, so to speak.Watch Video: 2023 NFL Draft Overreactions: The Eagles have more talent to help them reach Super Bowl 58 Remember that your formula for impedance is: If the impedance was only real and not complex, it would mean your transmission line would be purely resistive with no indication of induction or capacitance. I'm not sure what you mean by "assuming the TL impedance is real". Otherwise if the reflection coefficient, \$\Gamma=-j\$, it would indicate a purely capacitive load. Henceforth, using the picture above, if the reflection coefficient, \$\Gamma=j\$, it would mean that the transmission has a purely inductive load. If you had to cut horizontal line across the middle of this circle in half, you would see that top half would be a more inductive load and the bottom half being a more capacitive load. real axis, you can basically determine real and imaginary components of the impedance. Wikipedia has a very good image of how the Smith Chart is organized (for impedance): Forgive me for my knowledge of transmission lines and microwave circuits is very minuscule.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |